The Associated Press carried a story
this week about a man
from Maine who traced his
ancestry to King Egbert of England as well as all of the royal houses of Europe.
The
article makes it sound like something rather unusual. My question is,
“So what?
Almost everyone else can do the same.”
For instance, here is a simple
chart showing the number of
ancestors you have, assuming an average of one generation every
twenty-five
years:
|
Number of generations |
Approximate years |
Ancestors in this generation |
Total ancestors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
25 |
2 |
2 |
|
2 |
50 |
4 |
6 |
|
3 |
75 |
8 |
14 |
|
4 |
100 |
16 |
30 |
|
5 |
125 |
32 |
62 |
|
6 |
150 |
64 |
126 |
|
7 |
175 |
128 |
254 |
|
8 |
200 |
256 |
510 |
|
9 |
225 |
512 |
1,022 |
|
10 |
250 |
1,024 |
2,046 |
|
11 |
275 |
2,048 |
4,094 |
|
12 |
300 |
4,096 |
8,190 |
|
13 |
325 |
8,192 |
16,382 |
|
14 |
350 |
16,384 |
32,766 |
|
15 |
375 |
32,768 |
65,534 |
|
16 |
400 |
65,536 |
131,070 |
|
17 |
425 |
131,072 |
262,142 |
|
18 |
450 |
262,144 |
524,286 |
|
19 |
475 |
524,288 |
1,048,574 |
|
20 |
500 |
1,048,576 |
2,097,150 |
|
21 |
525 |
2,097,152 |
4,194,302 |
|
22 |
550 |
4,194,304 |
8,388,606 |
|
23 |
575 |
8,388,608 |
16,777,214 |
|
24 |
600 |
16,777,216 |
33,554,430 |
|
25 |
625 |
33,554,432 |
67,108,862 |
|
26 |
650 |
67,108,864 |
134,217,726 |
|
27 |
675 |
134,217,728 |
268,435,454 |
|
28 |
700 |
268,435,456 |
536,870,910 |
|
29 |
725 |
536,870,912 |
1,073,741,822 |
|
30 |
750 |
1,073,741,824 |
2,147,483,646 |
|
31 |
775 |
2,147,483,648 |
4,294,967,294 |
|
32 |
800 |
4,294,967,296 |
8,589,934,590 |
|
33 |
825 |
8,589,934,592 |
17,179,869,182 |
|
34 |
850 |
17,179,869,184 |
34,359,738,366 |
|
35 |
875 |
34,359,738,368 |
68,719,476,734 |
|
36 |
900 |
68,719,476,736 |
137,438,953,470 |
|
37 |
925 |
137,438,953,472 |
274,877,906,942 |
|
38 |
950 |
274,877,906,944 |
549,755,813,886 |
|
39 |
975 |
549,755,813,888 |
1,099,511,627,774 |
|
40 |
1,000 |
1,099,511,627,776 |
2,199,023,255,550 |
As you can see, in the last 1,000
years you have a bit
more than two trillion ancestors. There is only one problem
with
this: that number far exceeds the total number of people who have ever
lived on
the face of the earth!
In fact, there are duplicates in
your family tree. If you
were able to identify every single person in your family tree, you
would find
that many ancestors of a few hundred years ago would show up time and
time
again. This is inbreeding, and we all have it in our family trees.
There are no
exceptions; the mathematics involved makes it obvious that we are all
the
products of inbreeding.
With a theoretical (although
impractical) one and a half
trillion ancestors in the past 1,000 years, what are the odds that you
have
royal ancestry? About 99.9999% per cent. Many of the royals had large
families
with children, grandchildren, and further descendants who were sent far
and
wide to marry other nobility. In turn, their descendants married minor
nobility
and wealthy merchants and their children... so on and so forth. Once
you can
document one royal ancestor, you will probably find hundreds more,
thanks to
the excellent records kept of nobility marriages.
Now
let’s go the
other way: let’s look at a hypothetical individual from 750
years ago and
identify the number of descendants he or she has. The numbers are not
as
mathematically precise since each person has a variable number of
descendants.
Sociologists tell us that families of many years ago were typically
larger than
those of today. Indeed, history books record that a few kings and other
prominent men often had 50 or more children, thanks to multiple wives.
Not
everyone had children, however. Many people had zero children. For this
exercise, I will pick an average number of five children per family:
|
Number of generations |
Approximate years |
Descendants in this generation |
Total descendants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
25 |
5 |
5 |
|
2 |
50 |
25 |
30 |
|
3 |
75 |
125 |
155 |
|
4 |
100 |
625 |
780 |
|
5 |
125 |
3,125 |
3,905 |
|
6 |
150 |
15,625 |
19,530 |
|
7 |
175 |
78,125 |
97,655 |
|
8 |
200 |
390,625 |
488,280 |
|
9 |
225 |
1,953,125 |
2,441,405 |
|
10 |
250 |
9,765,625 |
12,207,030 |
|
11 |
275 |
48,828,125 |
61,035,155 |
|
12 |
300 |
244,140,625 |
305,175,780 |
|
13 |
325 |
1,220,703,125 |
1,525,878,905 |
|
14 |
350 |
6,103,515,625 |
7,629,394,530 |
|
15 |
375 |
30,517,578,125 |
38,146,972,655 |
|
16 |
400 |
152,587,890,625 |
190,734,863,280 |
|
17 |
425 |
762,939,453,125 |
953,674,316,405 |
|
18 |
450 |
3,814,697,265,625 |
4,768,371,582,030 |
|
19 |
475 |
19,073,486,328,125 |
23,841,857,910,155 |
|
20 |
500 |
95,367,431,640,625 |
119,209,289,550,780 |
|
21 |
525 |
476,837,158,203,125 |
596,046,447,753,905 |
|
22 |
550 |
2,384,185,791,015,620 |
2,980,232,238,769,530 |
|
23 |
575 |
11,920,928,955,078,100 |
14,901,161,193,847,700 |
|
24 |
600 |
59,604,644,775,390,600 |
74,505,805,969,238,300 |
|
25 |
625 |
298,023,223,876,953,000 |
372,529,029,846,191,000 |
|
26 |
650 |
1,490,116,119,384,770,000 |
1,862,645,149,230,960,000 |
|
27 |
675 |
7,450,580,596,923,830,000 |
9,313,225,746,154,780,000 |
|
28 |
700 |
37,252,902,984,619,100,000 |
46,566,128,730,773,900,000 |
|
29 |
725 |
186,264,514,923,096,000,000 |
232,830,643,653,870,000,000 |
|
30 |
750 |
931,322,574,615,478,000,000 |
1,164,153,218,269,350,000,000 |
Your
ancestor of
750 years ago had more than a sextillion descendants! Again, this will
be true
of each king and peasant alike. While this may be claimed as a
mathematical
“fact,” it is obviously impossible. Again, there
have not been that many people
in the world.
The challenge is to find your royal ancestors. Documentation of the royal families is plentiful, but finding your link back through many generations of commoners may be a challenge. While not every one of us will ever be able to prove descent from royalty, the odds are overwhelming that we all have such connections, documented or not. You just need to spend some time to find them!
Finding such ancestry can be
personally satisfying
although I question if it rates an article in a national wire service.
You can
read the Associated Press article in the Boston Globe at http://tinyurl.com/e74ke
My thanks to Michael White for
telling me about the
Associated Press article.
