(+) Microfilm or Digital?
Warning: This article contains personal opinions.
I was surprised and a bit dismayed this week when I read about the discovery of a lot of old records at a county courthouse. Local archivists spent thousands of hours sorting, filing, and organizing the documents. They repaired damaged documents and worked hard to preserve all the documents for examination by future historians, genealogists, social scientists, deed searchers, and others.
Such efforts are commendable. A handful of people labored intensely so that many others will be served in the future. Then I read one more line: the archivists also microfilmed the records. Microfilmed? My heart sunk. Hey folks, this is the twenty-first century!
Microfilm is so "nineteen eighties." Today we have better and cheaper methods that will serve many more people.
The remainder of this article is for Plus Edition subscribers only.
If you have a Plus Edition user ID and password, you can read the article right now at no additional charge in this web site's Plus Edition blog at http://eogn.com/plusedition
If you do not remember your Plus Edition user ID or password, you can retrieve them at http://eogn.com/amember/member.php
Non-Plus Edition subscribers may purchase this article right now at http://www.lulu.com/content/798457.
If you decide to subscribe to the Plus Edition right now, you will be able to immediately read this article online. For more information about subscribing to the Plus Edition of Eastman's Online Genealogy Newsletter, visit http://www.eogn.com/plus