Nearly two years ago, I wrote several articles about the death of William M. V. Kingsland. He died intestate (without a will) and with an apartment crammed with rare works of art. You can see my earlier articles at http://tinyurl.com/6gjapa. Now it seems that much of the artwork was stolen.
After winding through the legal system, a probate judge ordered that Kingsland's possessions be auctioned off and the proceeds held for a number of years, waiting for claims by heirs, if any. If the money is unclaimed, it will eventually be given to the State of New York.
Kingsland was a well-known figure among art houses and within Upper East Side high society. He seemed to be an expert on the genealogy of prominent local families. He also claimed to be from a high society family himself and sometimes told friends his middle initials stood for Milliken and Vanderbilt and that he lived on Fifth Avenue.
Investigators now know that his name at birth was Melvyn Kohn and that he was the son of Jewish refugees from Europe who lived in the Bronx. Kohn legally changed his name to William M. V. Kingsland when he was seventeen years old.
There was no Fifth Avenue address; he lived on the Upper East Side. Nor had Kingsland ever attended Harvard or been married to a French royal, as he had often claimed.
Kingsland's apartment was crammed with art, books, and other assorted items. There was barely enough room to sit down. His art collection contained about 300 pieces, including works by Alberto Giacometti, Pablo Picasso, Odilon Redon and John Singleton Copley. Paintings were stuffed under the bed, behind the couch, and elsewhere. He also had a bust by Giacometti, which has now been valued at about $1 million. Kingsland used it as a doorstop.
Problems arose when various pieces were transferred to Christie's auction house and listed in catalogs, complete with color photographs. Art experts started calling with reports that the various pieces had previously been stolen. For instance, the John Singleton Copley painting of the Second Earl of Bessborough was stolen from Harvard University in 1971. The bust by Giacometti that was Kingsland's doorstop has now been identified as stolen, as has a small still-life painting by Giorgio Morandi. The FBI has now identified 20 stolen pieces but suspects more of the remaining 137 pieces whose origins are not yet known also could be stolen.
Colin Stair of the Stair Galleries auction house in Hudson, New York, helped catalog the collection. He remarked, "The smaller the items were, the more likely they were to have been stolen."
There is a "story within a story" here as well. When the paintings were being transferred from Kingsland's apartment to the auction houses, two works by Picasso were stolen from the moving company's truck. The paintings were later recovered by the FBI, who then discovered that both paintings had originally been stolen from a New York gallery in 1967.
You can read more about this story at http://www.guardian.co.uk/artanddesign/2008/aug/13/arttheft.art.
Genealogists make the best spies.
Posted by: Code Red | August 18, 2008 at 11:28 PM
So if you were previously a legitimate owner of one of these works of art that had the misfortune to have it stolen, all you can now hope for is to get paid for it.
Unless you go buy it back at the auction, then the winner will be the auctioneers who take their cut of your money.
I'm thinking that the Judge should have ordered the whole collection held pending claiming by each item's rightful owners.
Oh well, none of it's mine, so I guess I don't really care
Roger
Posted by: theKiwi | August 19, 2008 at 12:05 AM
I'll bet he never published his genealogies online either. Like so many other 'genealogists', he was probably afraid someone would steal his research.
Posted by: Traci | August 19, 2008 at 12:30 AM
Actualy, those who purchase stolen art generally have no standing. Since this debacle has been uncovered, those pieces that are determined to be stolen will very likely find their way back to the original owner. I've seen this happen before from working in the legal field over the past 37 years. Ever here of the caveat "Buyer Beware!"???? This is the type of issue one will be cloaked in when they buy these types of items.
Posted by: Denise Wells | August 19, 2008 at 08:23 AM
Reading the Guardian article, I was struck by the fact that there seems to be no centralised art database to which buyers and sellers can refer when a piece is discovered in an attic or comes up for auction.
Surely modern technology provides the perfect means to store detailed information about each work : photographs, provenance, past & present ownership (where public), restoration, thefts, forgeries etc.
If the art world itself is not interested, perhaps this is a new avenue for Google to explore - Google Art?
Posted by: Caroline Gurney | August 19, 2008 at 10:18 AM
I found this of interest, especially after reading The Rescue Artist: A True Story of Art, Thieves, and the Hunt for a Missing Masterpiece by Edward Dolnich. According to the book, if there were a Museum of Missing Art, it would contain hundreds of stolen pieces by Picasso, Rembrandt, Van Gogh, among many other great artists. Hopefully, these pieces will be given to the proper owners.
Posted by: Ann | August 19, 2008 at 07:20 PM