« The Easter Bunny in my Driveway | Main | Burglary at FamilySearch »

April 08, 2009

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Richard Heaton

After putting on line surviving family documents (few more to do) - personally I'm gradually scanning my misc. document collection (part of which is already on loan to archives but probably won't be properly catalogued for a while - under fragments of lost lives) and continue to transcribe (when I have chance) my sprawling newspaper collection. If I could afford to digitialise my collection I would do so - but the cost currently is too great. But should A1 size scanners ever fall significantly in price I'll probably scan all the unique newspapers as well (copies not available as far as I'm aware in any other UK collection).

I only wish there was a method for engaging US document collectors (probably a number in Australia, Canada, and the UK) to scan and make available their private collections.

Cheers
Richard H

Sabrina Stradtner

At the library I work at we are currently working to digitize the county's marriage licenses. We create a bound book and a CD of the images we take at the court house. We also create a searchable index. We have many county records and pictures in our possession that need to be digitized. Unfortunately, it's easier to come up with projects than actually getting them done. Money and man power are the two biggest issues. None of our projects would get done without our volunteers.

Peter Hecht

The destruction of the Cologne archive is certainly a tragedy as it was material saved over centuries by a history conscious country. In many countries, documents and materials are not being saved and thus will never be known to be lost. Canada is one of these countries where fewer and fewer people know about even our recent history.

In the last few years, Ontario, the largest and one of the oldest of provinces decided there was no more space to store land registry records and so preparations were made to dispose of these records. Although some were stored digitally (in questionnable format), it is possible that many boxes were disposed of before anyone knowledgeable noticed.

And our national archives are located in a 1950s or 60s building which suffers regularly from broken pipes in the ceilings. The stacks have been covered by plastic sheets but damage is still done. Many documents are in commercial freezers until they can be saved. Yet at the same time, staff and resources are being cut back. Reading room hours are being severely limited and many documents are made inaccessible.

Although we like to pride ourselves on being superior in many ways to the United States, I only wish that we had an equivalent to your Library of Congress as well as the myriad number of local libraries and historical societies who were able to store documents doomed by the electronic age practices of those who have no faith in the past and who discard paper once only data of immediate interest is entered into a computer system somewhere. At the same time, much data management has been privatised so that citizens must pay a fortune for copies of data collected by public taxpayers expense.

Thank goodness for people in other countries who value our records more than we do. Thanks to you and the hardworkers below the radar for at least keeping records even if they aren't yet available.

Ron Darrah

I remember reading that the IRS has thousands of rolls of data files that no one can now access because the machines and coding
has been lost. Is this true and is there any attempt to retrieve
this material?

Dick Eastman

NOT true, although I believe that "urban myth" was about the Census Bureau, not the I.R.S. I wrote about that myth six years ago this week. You can read my article at http://www.eogn.com/archives/news0315.htm#1960USCensus

- Dick Eastman

hslanham

I am registering much of my research at
www.findagrave.com
I enter a photo of the stone plus general
information plus photos of the person.
I had one distant cousin email me regarding
a stone I photographed about 8 years
ago. He said that my photo is now more
readable than the actual stone.
I also register tombstones of people not
related to me just to get the record out there.

Margaret Harris

I would like for every librarian in the land to receive this post! Every archivist, every employee of every repository, everywhere: Push for digitization.

Mike Brubaker

By suggesting that digitization replace microfilm you are comparing apples of oranges. Digitization may enhance access, but it does nothing for preservation.
Keep in mind that changing technologies will require updates for digitized projects every few years. You can anticipate throwing more money away as the digital project ages. I also disagree that digital projects are inexpensive. For large projects the costs can be huge.
Microfilm is a one cost project--create the film and use it. Microfilm will last upwards of one hundred years. With current digital technolgy, good luck having the same resources in ten years.
if you have the money and time, do both microfilm and digitize. If your money is limited, microfilm first. You can always digitize later--from the microfilm.

Dick Eastman

As you mentioned, "changing technologies will require updates..."

Microfilm is a technology that is going away. In ten or twenty years, there will be no new microfilm. Organizations such as the Mormon Church are already converting their microfilms to digital images because of disappearing technologies. (I doubt if they will ever throw the old microfilms away but they will be less and less useful every year.)

As you wrote, "Microfilm will last upwards of one hundred years." I agree. However, what good will that be when microfilm readers are no longer available? In fact, microfilm CAMERAS are already difficult to purchase and microfilm itself (unexposed reels) is already difficult to find. The number of microfilm readers available for sale has dropped dramatically in the past few years as manufacturers are closing down production. In fact, the "hot item" for the manufacturers today is "microfilm-to-digital conversion devices," namely microfilm scanners.

- Dick Eastman

Jason Presley

In the last 15 years, the only changes I've seen in "digitization" technology has been the increase in quality and storage density. The JPGs, TIFFs and PNGs from 10-15 years ago are no less accessible now than they day they were created. There's no reason to think the basic technologies the visual aspects of the WWW have been built around are going to be come obsolete all that quickly. Besides, most of these digitization projects are scanning their materials in at extraordinarily high resolutions, so even conversions to newer formats (if that's even necessary) is unlikely to result is any noticable degradation.

Once something is digitized, duplication of that asset is essentially free, it's only the initial effort that has any real cost associated with it. Copying a reel of microfilm is not free and requires specialized equipment. Duplication of digital materials can be done with any low-end personal computer.

Jim Lynch

Although I live in Canada I am originally from the Caribbean (Barbados) and several years ago I put a proposal out there for a CHPI (Caribbean Historical Preservation Institute) whose object would be to digitise every available record throughout the Caribbean.

Attached to the Institute's interests and activities would have been volunteer genealogy tourism, attachments from Universities for archaeologists and paper chemistry researchers, high quality printing, souvenirs, sales over the internet to support ongoing activities, and many other interests.

I envisioned the Insititute starting in one island and developing a workable model; and then exporting model "packages" to the other islands/countries in pre-packed 40-foot containers (vehicle, desks, chairs, digitising equipment, back-up generator, etc.) which on arrival and installation on a pre-poured slab with utilities would serve as hurricane-proof offices and storage. Digitised pages and would be eexported via internet and hard drives to other parts of the world for safe-keeping.

Given the record of hurricanes, earthquakes and ither natural (and man-made) disasters as well as destruction by termites, insects and the open and grossly casual destruction and dumping by island governments (I have heard that in St. Vincent they dump excess records on the damp floors of disused jail cells, and they rot from the ground up), anyone would think this would have been received well and seen as a priority, but so far there have been no takers at all.

I initially tried to gather some people together to register it as a non-profit and approach companies like Xerox for new or used equipment and donations, but have received no responses and no expressions of interest. I approached the Gates Foundation and several other donors and benefactors, but the ones who did reply said that was not in their target field.

As an alternative, I gathered copies of two sets of books on the verge of disappearing due to insect damage and acid-paper deterioration (Vere Langford Oliver's "History of Antigua" and "Caribbeana") and re-published them mnyself under ISBN numbers and with the highest quality materials and binding.

My Proposal remains on the web... and still with no experssions of interest from anyone.
http://www.candoo.com/chpi/index.html

If you are interested in activating the Proposal, you merely need to write to me and ask for access to the Discussion Forum, and we can take it from there.

Jim Lynch

Joan Griffis

A recent article in the St. Pete Times" (FL) had information on Brewster Kahle "who would be the Web's librarian" because he is taking on the long time task of creating "the world's largest digital library" (of everything that has ever been published.) His openlibrary.org is intended to provide everything available online. Haven't found it yet, but does anyone know anything more about this project and its validity?

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Receive FREE daily newsletter updates by email

  • Enter your email address


    Click here to see a typical e-mail message you will receive.

    I promise that:

    1. I will never sell, rent, or give away your address to any outside party, ever;
    2. I will never send you any unrequested e-mail, besides newsletter updates; and
    3. All unsubscribe requests are honored immediately, period.

My Photo

Search This Site for Past Articles

Meet Dick Eastman in Person

November 2009

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30          

Amazon Kindle

Offers

Blog powered by TypePad

Amazon Picks

Receive daily newsletter updates by email

  • Enter your Email


    Preview

    (Don't worry, I hate spam as much as you do and you will be able to UNSUBSCRIBE within seconds at any time!)