MyHeritage Adds More Than 5 Million Dutch Records to SuperSearch™

The following is an extract from an article in the MyHeritage Blog:

We have just added over 5 million Dutch records to MyHeritage SuperSearch™, including Birth, Marriage and Death records from the Rotterdam City Archives. Hailing from the Dutch province of South Holland, this collection represents an extremely valuable part of Rotterdam heritage from the early 19th century and on.

Rotterdam in 1888 (Image Credit: Wikipedia)

Search the Rotterdam City Archives now!

The three collections included are:

The new records cover an interesting time period in the history of Rotterdam. The second half of the 19th century was a time of great change in the city as it grew and developed into the large city it is today.

A major factor for its rapid growth was the opening of the Nieuwe Waterweg or New Waterway. Built between 1866 and 1872, it connected Rotterdam port with the sea, making the city accessible to seafaring vessels.

The growth had a network effect on the city; once rapid growth began, many more ports were built, and the job market expanded tremendously. Workers came from all over the world to work and live in Rotterdam.

You can read the full article at


Very cool. This may become useful to me.


Another excellent source of Dutch records is WieWasWie (WhoWasWho) at:
with a free registration.


Leave a Reply

Name and email address are required. Your email address will not be published.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

You may use these HTML tags and attributes:

<a href="" title="" rel=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <pre> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong> 

%d bloggers like this: